fMRI while viewing suffering, found at ccc.farmsanctuary.org |
That this exists is not a question anymore - functional MRIs, for example, have proven that experiencing an emotion and observing it in someone else activate the same areas in the brain. The picture on the right shows an fMRI of a brain while the person is looking at pictures of other people experiencing pain - the posterior parietal cortex (as well as the occipital lobe), which has been linked to empathy, is immensely active.
Space: the final frontier. One of the places only fiction can take us - for now. Found at henrykh.wordpress.com. |
Brain activity in different situations; found at www.ilabs.washington.edu |
Dr Oatley's second article is more specifically focused on empathy related to fiction.
In it, he describes a study conducted this year by Dan Johnson at Washington and Lee University which was based on one of Oatley's ideas from 2008 - the idea that reading fiction and empathising with a fictional protagonist can actually increase our empathy towards 'real' people.
For the study, Johnson wrote a 15-minute short story designed to elicit a compassionate response from the reader and "model prosocial behaviour". He met with each participant individually and had them read the story. Then they went through several tests and questionnaires to measure their level of absorption into the book and to what degree they empathised with the main character.
Johnson then did something I personally find very clever: With the unknowing participant watching, he 'accidentally' dropped six pens, and later recorded whether the participants had helped him to pick them up.
As you probably guessed, the level of empathy towards the character in the short story was directly proportional to how willing the participants were to help with picking up the pens.
Jonson conducted one more experiment, in which the last test before the pen-dropping measured 'emotional bias' of the participants. They were asked to rate the level of fear on a number of faces they were shown. The more a person had been absorbed into the short story, the more emotion they interpreted into other faces, and the more fear they saw in the faces, the more likely they were to then help Johnson pick up his pens.
There is one thing that might have influenced the results, though: it said the short story Johnson wrote was specifically designed to elicit empathy and "prosocial behaviour", so that may mean that the translation of fictional to real empathy might not always be present, or at least not as noticeable, depending on the type of story. Also, I still don't know how the 'level of absorption' into a book and the amount of empathy felt towards a fictional characters can exactly be mathematically measured.
But other than that, I think this was a brilliant study - especially since the way of measuring empathy, picking up pens, and doing this with only one participant at a time, practically guaranteed that they wouldn't have guessed the aim of the experiment, so no bias there. In addition to that, it was a relatively easy task that anyone could have performed and that didn't involve major ethical dilemmas.
So in summary, we can say that our brain experiences situations through fictional characters, which creates the feeling of empathy - and this can be translated into empathy and prosocial behaviour in real life, towards real people.
In even shorter summary, read more books.
------------
Find the two articles here: Narrative Psychology and Empathy and Fiction.