Tuesday, August 21

The Geniuses of Television and What They Tell Us

In their world, they are the social outcasts. Here, they are adored by the fanbase. They have the darkest stories, and the most brilliant minds.

What would a great television series be without a tortured genius? The nerd, the socially awkward doctor, the new type of protagonist that has long taken over the good old knight in shining armour, these are the characters worth creating storylines for.

Who am I thinking of here?

Firstly, of course, a pioneer of the genre; the venerable character of Sherlock Holmes. Since this isn't a comparison of old literature, this will refer to the newest incarnation of the famous consulting detective - the main character of BBC's 2010 series Sherlock.
Secondly, a character whose personality is worthy of a hundred more separate articles: the misanthropic, ever-suffering, superficially immature cynical genius of Dr Gregory House, a diagnostician ingeniously created by David Shore for his 2004-2012 show House, M.D..

Of course, there are others. However, I feel that the characters of Dr Spencer Reid and Dr Sheldon Cooper, who would definitely make it onto this list, are in many ways exaggerated for comic purposes, and I don't have enough experience to talk about other shows, I suppose. (I decided that Spock and Data can't be included on account of not being human.)

So, what do these two have in common? Technically, one might argue that a comparison between the two is hardly fair, since we know that House was based on the original Holmes, and the new BBC Holmes was greatly influenced by House, but that makes it all the easier to point out the stereotypes.
Because I am lazy, I simply made a table to show similar characteristics of the two:


Sherlock Holmes
Dr Gregory House
Officially diagnosed as a 'high-functioning sociopath'
Is constantly being described as sociopathic
Famous for his mastery of the art of deduction; his reasoning skills and the logic he applies
Brilliantly combines and deduces to find the most logical diagnosis possible
Indifferent towards his clients; only cares about the mystery and solving the crime
Barely every visits his patients; only interested in solving the medical puzzles his team presents him with
Able to 'read' people by the most insignificant aspects of their appearance
Has been known to analyse people by not only their behaviour, but also their shoes
Incredibly bored with 'normal' life - to the extent of shooting holes into his wall
Only takes cases he deems interesting (medical mysteries no one else could solve)
A "proper genius" - for example, he knows the entire map of the city of London by heart and can even calculate for the traffic lights.
Speaks six languages including Russian, Hindi and Mandarin and can diagnose most diseases in the clinic with less than a glance at the patient
Plays the violin
Plays the piano
Has a best friend - Dr John Watson - who is also his roommate and the only person he doesn't keep at a far distance
Has a best friend - Dr James Wilson - who is also temporarily his roommate and the only person he doesn't keep at a far distance


A bored Sherlock shoots the wall.

And the list goes on. As we can see, it is rather obvious that Holmes and House share the majority of their character traits. We also know that both Sherlock and House, M.D. are among the most popular television series - Sherlock is a little newer, but I couldn't think of anyone my age or above who has never heard of Dr House.

Anyway - now what is it that makes these characters so popular among the fans? They are far from athletic, neither rich nor tanned, don't exactly run around with no shirt on and don't have a muscular chest to be exposed anyway. They don't get the ladies, they are simply not cool.

First of all, television seems to have established an awful lot of genius clichés and stereotypes that puts these people into a certain category and assigns them a stack of certain characteristics. But what are these stereotypes, and why do we find them intriguing? The brilliant website Television Tropes has actually made a list HERE, but it is rather lengthy, so I will summarise it.


  • Social isolation is a MUST-HAVE.
  • An intelligent person doesn't know how to act in social situations.
  • What the hell is empathy?
  • An intelligent person is consumed with what they are interested in (in this case, crimes and medicine) and don't care about other things.
  • An intelligent person doesn't understand feelings and also probably has none or at least can't express them. 
  • An intelligent person must have at least one amusing quirk - for example, Dr Spencer Reid from Criminal Minds doesn't shake hands with others, and Dr Sheldon Cooper from The Big Bang Theory only sits in 'his' spot on the couch. 
  • Relating to the popular quirks, the common television genius has managed to transform Asperger's Syndrome and hypochondria into a number one comic relief method.
  • In order to be interesting to watch on the telly, an intelligent person that appears in a drama series should have as dark a past as possible - we learn very early about the abuse House suffered through his father, or that Dr Reid was left to live alone with his severely schizophrenic mother before reaching high school.  
  • A great deal of narcissism and arrogance are necessary, because otherwise there wouldn't be enough snarky conversations to laugh about.
  • The genius has problems dealing with the fact that he or she is the only one who uses words like anthropomorphise on a daily basis, ideally to describe his or her breakfast
  • The common genius has no concern for clothing and looks (although attractiveness is kind of unavoidable on television).
  • The television genius has Übermensch-like abilities when it comes to his area of expertise (e.g. solving crimes), but shouldn't be good at other things (e.g. sports), otherwise it would become too boring after all.
These are just some of the few stereotypes television has set up for us - a list of things that go through the Western mind as soon as we see a person that happens to wear glasses, has an interest in physics or happens to read a nonfiction book.
Do these lead to self-fulfilling prophecies? The answer, sadly, tends to be yes. If someone is expected to be mysteriously devoid of social skills, why would we even try and talk to him? You heard this guy took all three sciences in high school? He's probably some self-obsessed arrogant weirdo. She has frizzy hair and speaks for languages - why try bonding, she probably doesn't want a social life.

Even more so, pretty much every single TV genius has shown us that being smart gives everyone a special VIP privilege to ignore ethical guidelines, hurt feelings, behave like children and generally insult others and ignore superiors. House is the prime example for this, but there are others, such as Cal Lightman or Patrick Jane. You can afford to be a cranky, misanthropic twat - because you're always, without fail and every time, right.


A helpful guide to House, M.D.
There is another problem with the genius image. First of all, how does House solve all his cases? Right, with a sudden epiphany, usually while talking about something entirely unrelated like monster trucks with his best and only friend Wilson. We don't see House sweating over medical dictionaries, frantically searching for a solution. Castle's Nathan Fillion suddenly finds the murderer while talking to his daughter over breakfast.

Basically, the 'common' minds - us little, insignificant people who only speak one or two languages, only have one PhD and a number of friends outside of work - are being told that these borderline supernaturally talented people have the answer inside their heads the entire time: they just need someone to ask the right question at the right time. How do they do it?, the common mind asks. I don't see them working hard! It answers itself just a moment later: Smart people don't need to work that hard... either that, or they just always worked harder than us.

So the basic message of smartness on television is that either, you are simply not as intelligent as the eccentric doctor, or you were somehow too lazy to get multiple degrees at Yale and/or Oxford at the age of 20, master five different languages, win several awards with your best-selling novels and also be a handsome yoga practitioner with a beautiful girlfriend. Either way, you failed your life.

Let me summarise the message of a typical television genius in a few useful bullet points. For more of a rant on the subject, check out this brilliant little article HERE.


  • Even if you're smart, you can't be as smart (or good-looking) as them
  • You're either too stupid or you don't work hard enough
  • You can't be friends with a smart person, they don't know how to socialise.
  • Smart people don't want friends.
  • If you're smart, it's okay to be mean. You have the unique privilege to be hurtful and insulting and spread misery wherever you go, if you please to do so.
But we shouldn't forget that the TV genius is still a character among a group of characters. Yes, we enjoy watching a good medical drama or crime show - I definitely do. But let's be honest - who watches House, M.D. to catch up on immunology? Do we really only care about who the murderer is? I think it's important to keep in mind that most producers try really hard to give their character at least a certain humanity. Nobody would watch a TV show that makes it impossible to identify with the protagonists.
The episodes in which we can empathise with a character's personal drama, especially season finales, without fail receive higher ratings than any others.

So yes, geniuses on television are greatly influenced by major stereotypes and are depicted as unnaturally, superhumanly talented and gifted. Now to come back to my original question regarding what makes these characters so much more intriguing than any other type of protagonist. Personally, I believe that while we are bombarded with all these messages that might destroy our confidence completely, the human race also gains a certain pleasure from watching the 'different' people struggle. We laugh about Sheldon Cooper's plain weirdness and sigh in relief that we're not weird like that. We see that House feels so miserable he becomes addicted to painkillers. In the end, I think the message we get balances out - a sweet, exhilarating mixture between disappointment in the face of one's own incompetence, mixed with relief at falling within the bell curve of normality and spiced with varying amounts of sympathy towards the character. Quite frankly, the tortured genius is more interesting. In that regard, us normal people are like House - we care about the twisted, fascinating cases that can't be solved just by looking.

The point, I can't find the point! To stop this from becoming more of a ramble than it already is, I will simply end this by saying that I personally love both Dr House and Sherlock Holmes, and that I despise stereotypes about people that were born with a higher-than-average IQ or do some things differently. Lastly, I think TV series that have a common genius may be defined by that character, but they will also focus on human emotions; because that is the key trigger to get the ratings up.

A Rather Lengthy Insight Into Spock's Father


 Although he is not a prominent or regular member of the Star Trek cast, the character of Ambassador Sarek is one that seems uncharacteristically popular among fans of the series. After Sarek’s first appearance in the thirty-ninth episode of The Original Series, Journey to Babel, a lot of the interest came from his obvious connection to Spock – the fans’ all-time favourite – as his father, but it did not take the fans very long to realise that with Sarek, they had been given a second Vulcan, a full one this time, whose character depths and complexities very nearly equal those of his son.
Sarek (Mark Lenard) giving the famous Vulcan salute.

Sarek was born in 2164 (or 2165, according to Memory-Alpha.org) on Vulcan. His father was Skon, son of Solkar. His mother is never mentioned, although some non-canonical sources like to use T’Pau, who can be seen in The Original Series episode Amok Time. Sarek was very possibly born in or near the metropolis Shi’Kahr, where he raised his son Spock (and his other son Sybok, if you consider Sybok canon) and continued to live until his death on an estate named D’H’riset. Semi-canonical works have used S’chn T’gai as a first name for both Sarek and Spock. The original script of Journey to Babel states that before going into politics, Sarek was an astrophysicist. This information was not included in the actual episode – which did, however, indicate that Sarek possesses a significant amount of computer-technological knowledge. Either way, his diplomatic expertise allowed him to climb the hierarchical ladder of politics rather quickly, and he became the Vulcan Ambassador extraordinaire to Earth and the Federation. According to his third wife, Perrin, Sarek “owes the Federation a lifetime of service”, and he had soon established his reputation as one of the most significant politicians of his time.

First Officer William Riker of the USS Enterprise-D once says, “I remember studying his career in school.” Sarek’s most distinguished political achievements that are considered canonical, many of which led to him being immortalised in numerous Starfleet history records, include the admission of Coridan into the Federation, his involvement in the Klingon Treaty of Alliance and the Khitomer Accords, as well as the treaties of Alpha Cygnus IX and Legara IV. The latter took the incredible effort of 93 years and was finalised less than two years before Sarek’s death with the help of Captain Jean-Luc Picard of the Enterprise-D.


It was on this mission in 2366 that Sarek was diagnosed with Bendii Syndrome, a debilitating, slowly progressing and untreatable lethal condition that only affects Vulcan males over the age of two hundred Terran years. The effects of the disease have been compared to those of Alzheimer’s in humans. The major component of Bendii Syndrome is, however, not primarily dementia, but rather the loss of the emotional control that is a quintessential part of any Vulcan’s culture and pride, making the condition far more frightening and painful than many others. Furthermore, the disease affects neurochemical pathways, leading to gradual deterioration of the brain. The later symptoms therefore include loss of memory, confusion and dementia as well as loss of more delicate motor functions. The latter leads to one of the most touching and heart-breaking scenes of The Next Generation, in the episode Unification I, where Captain Picard helps Sarek put his fingers in the right position for a ta’al (Vulcan salute), only days before his death.

The Next Generation has done a great deal to unveil Sarek’s personality in several ways. In the aptly titled episode Sarek in season three especially, we learn a lot about the man’s personal pride and the feeling of great dignity that his majestic appearance already suggests. To summarise one could say that Sarek is “a very Vulcan Vulcan” in the same way his second wife Amanda Grayson has been called “a very human human”. He keeps his own dying a secret for as long as possible, and for the last year of his life he dwells in seclusion with his third wife Perrin; wishing to see no one - it is a vulnerability he cannot bear to reveal.

Sarek, like most Vulcans, believes in logic and rationality as the source of peace and progress. Often, the Terrans of Star Trek, such as Dr Leonard McCoy, can be found accusing their neighbours of being cold and ‘heartless’. Sarek, however, never appears deliberately mean, unlikeable or arrogant. On the contrary; the way he delivers his logic, while always calm and quiet, has a certain quality of warmth to it, and sometimes there is almost a naiveté of some kind that seems to sincerely ask “Because what else would I do?”, as in for instance the last scene of Journey to Babel.

It is, of course, hard to describe the character of someone who never really shows any emotion in depth. For a Vulcan, however, Sarek seems to be more susceptible to emotions than would be considered average. Whether that is natural or rather a result of having two human wives, working with humans at the Terran embassy and in the Federation and also dealing with his constantly ostracised son Spock is another question. At least in The Original Series, however, it is clear that Sarek is at peace with himself and whatever emotions he may have. In many Star Trek novels that are generally considered fanon, such as The Pandora Principle by Carolyn Clowes, Sarek’s utter conviction that peace can and has to be achieved no matter the case and that any violence has to be avoided at all costs is mentioned and praised as a quality that makes him such a valuable Federation ambassador.

Another attribute worth mentioning is Sarek’s ‘darkness’. In Diane Duane’s novel Spock’s World, his entering a room aboard the USS Enterprise is described with the words “Darkness walked in: Sarek, in his usual diplomatic dress” (Spock’s World, p. 89). This thought-provoking word choice can be interpreted many different ways. Sarek obviously is not someone who takes things lightly. Like most Vulcans, he is very serious about his job and responsibilities and work in general – however, most of the situations depicted in Star Trek are rather dangerous and often consist of life-threatening adventures and risks, so a certain amount of professionalism is usually present in and expected from all the characters. One could also say that “darkness” relates only to Sarek’s appearance, which, as has already been mentioned, does in fact have a very dark, solemnly majestic and dignified quality.

Both Spock’s World and A. C. Crispin’s novel Sarek also tend to show his character with a tinge of very dry, sarcastic humour. This, fortunately, is never overplayed and never seems out-of-character. Diane Duane wrote, for example:

“Father”, Spock said. “Are you and Mother well?”
The dry voice, far away, got an ironic tone to it. “I had not thought you gone so far into human behaviour, my son, as to begin indulging in ‘small talk’ with me.” (Spock’s World, p. 10)

In fact, Journey to Babel may have started the notion by the following conversation between Sarek and the Tellarite Ambassador Gav who is later murdered:

GAV: Vulcan, I would speak to you!
SAREK (suppressed sigh, rather sarcastic tone): It does seem unavoidable.

Sarek’s hard-working serenity, sincere logic and this dry edge combine to give an extremely charming individual. It is canonically established that Sarek had at least three partners and was married to at least two of them. His first wife or bond mate was the Vulcan princess T’Rea, with whom he had his first, semi-canonical son Sybok. But Sarek was not content with his Vulcan wife for reasons unknown to us. Many fan fictions like The Vulcan’s Wife by Aphrodite420 have suggested that after constantly being around humans while working on Earth, Sarek became rather accustomed to them and found himself actually missing their warmth and unpredictable emotionalism.

Understanding human behaviour has always been a difficult task for the Vulcans, and their struggles have been a focal point of many Star Trek episodes and even entire series, for example with Spock The Original Series or T’Pol in the newer ‘prequel’ Enterprise. Sarek is one of the few Vulcans that seem to have more or less mastered this task. He accepts and even enjoys new cultures and philosophies, especially the Terran ones, making him a well-liked colleague among his fellow politicians. Unlike many other members of advanced societies, he never judges humans and seems to instead tolerate and respect them. In Sarek, he beams aboard the USS Enterprise-D with a small but welcoming smile on his face, a contraction of facial muscles that Spock would have never allowed himself. Sarek, on the other hand, uses it as a diplomatic tool, not to manipulate, but to signalise open-mindedness and goodwill.

A lot of Sarek’s understanding of human behaviour is undoubtedly the doing of his second wife Amanda Grayson, an Earthwoman from Canada, later usually known as ‘The Lady Amanda’. The relationship between Sarek and Amanda is an interesting and unusual one. There are hundreds of stories illustrating how the two of them met and fell in love, but none of them have ever been approved by Gene Roddenberry. Sarek himself humorously answers his son’s question why he married Amanda with “At the time, it seemed like the logical thing to do”, drawing an affectionate smile from her. In the movie Star Trek from 2009 – usually referred to as the Reboot – Spock asks the same question, and years later, after Amanda’s untimely death during the destruction of Vulcan in the alternate timeline, Sarek simply says, “I married her because I loved her.”

Sarek and Amanda.
Either way, it is obvious that an inter-species marriage requires a tremendous amount of sacrifice and devotion from both partners. Amanda had to give up her home to move to Vulcan and then endure the constant patronising of her neighbours there. Sarek also is very likely to have encountered a lot of dismay regarding his bonding with a being as ‘unworthy’ as a human – even the children of Shi’Kahr openly call him a traitor.

In addition to that, it is more or less established that Amanda went through several miscarriages due to incompatible gene combinations before Spock was created with assistance from the Vulcan Science Academy or, in proper Vulcan, Shi’Oren t’Ek’tallar T’Khasi. Such experiences are usually said to either destroy marriages or make them stronger, and for Sarek and Amanda, it was definitely the latter case. In Journey to Babel the two appear almost inseparable without ever seeming ‘clingy’ or disrespectful of each other. Sarek answers Amanda’s humorous inquiries calmly and rationally, but still seems amused by them. He explains everything with the sweetest patience, without ever appearing patronising or even condescending. In one of the most famous (and only) dialogues between them in Journey to Babel, Sarek tries to explain his actions rationally for quite a while, finishing with:

SAREK: …Do you understand?
AMANDA (affectionately): Not really, but it doesn’t matter. I love you anyway. I know. It isn’t logical.

Amanda herself also shows a great understanding and acceptance of her husband, as can be seen in the following lines:

I know that you love me, she thought, gazing up at him. But I will not embarrass you by telling you so… (Sarek, p. 113)

And although Sarek logically knew that he was going to outlive Amanda by up to one hundred years, his pain after her death, even decades later, is truly heart-breaking. The grief of her loss is probably the most prominent emotion that manifests itself in The Next Generation, when Sarek, after being diagnosed with Bendii Syndrome, decides to mind-meld with Captain Picard in order to gain the emotional stability needed to finish his treaty with the Legarans, leading Picard to experience all of Sarek’s repressed emotions. Picard is in his quarters, accompanied by Dr Beverly Crusher for support. After the mind-meld, the human captain is close to a nervous breakdown, crying and screaming as Sarek’s grief and regret roll over him.

Because although he always has an air of serenity and contentment around him, Sarek has accumulated a devastating number of such regrets throughout his life. Most of them regard the relationship with his son Spock, which will be analysed later in this essay, as well as the fact that his Vulcan identity and upbringing have made it impossible for him to ever show his wives and son the love and devotion he felt for them. The following is a transcript of Sarek‘s soliloquy that is delivered though Captain Picard:

SAREK (through PICARD): No! It is wrong. It is wrong! A lifetime of discipline washed away, and in its place… bedlam. Bedlam! I am so old… there is nothing left but dry bones… and dead friends. Tired, oh so tired. …No! This weakness disgusts me! I hate it! Where is my logic? I am betrayed by… desires. I want to feel. I want to feel everything. …But I am a Vulcan. I must feel nothing. (Starts crying) Give me back my control… Perrin. Amanda. I wanted to give you so much more. I wanted to show you such… tenderness. But that is not our way. Spock. Amanda, did you know? Perrin, can you know how much I love you? (Sobbing) I do love you!
PICARD (as himself again): It is quite difficult. The anguish of the man, the despair pouring out of him, all those feelings. The regrets. (Sobbing) I can't stop them…

Sarek’s relationship with his third and last wife Perrin, another human, is different from the one with Amanda. In many ways it appears more serene and less ‘youthful’, although it is not clear whether that is based on age or simply on the metaphorical ‘chemistry’ between the two personalities. Although their relationship lacks the sweet, flirtatious qualities of Sarek’s marriage with Amanda, it is in no way short of the love and devotion we have seen before. In the end of Sarek, when the couple takes their leave of Picard, the Captain and Perrin exchange the following words:

PERRIN: Thank you, Captain.
PICARD: …He loves you very much.
PERRIN: I know. I have always known.

Sarek formally bids his son Spock (left) farwell.
After all this praise of Sarek’s character, it has to be said that he was never intended to be perfect, and his greatest flaw has always been his son Spock. The relationship of father and son has always been exceptionally strained, and it raises an important question: How come Sarek, the personification of tolerance, who was married to and worked among humans for most of his life, never seemed to accept his son’s human half, never seemed to acknowledge the ostracised child’s difficulties? Why was he never satisfied, no matter how hard Spock tried to please him? Sarek himself stated that it was his and Amanda’s dream to create a child as a symbol of their people’s unification and equality. In the 2009 Reboot, Sarek tells his son, “You will always be a child of two worlds. I am grateful for this. And for you.” So why does it never show?

There are people who do not consider The Animated Series canon. However, most people agree that a certain episode entitled Yesteryear is indeed canon, especially since it was written by Dorothy C. Fontana, who also created the script for Journey to Babel. Yesteryear features Spock having to go back into his own past to save his seven-year-old self from being killed by a Vulcan le-matya during his kahs-wan (a ritual that involves young children proving themselves by surviving out in the desert of Vulcan’s Forge without any assistance for ten days). Pretending to be a distant cousin of the family, Selek, Spock spends some time in his parents’ house, and we get a chance to observe their early family dynamics.

In the episode, Amanda says that Sarek does not understand his son very well, and much later, in The Search For Spock, Sarek himself admits to the High Priestess T’Lar, “My logic is uncertain where my son is concerned.” Even though that may not be intended to carry a negative connotation, other conversations between father and son like this one in Yesteryear are actually quite shocking:

SAREK: I do not expect you to fail.
SPOCK: What if I do, Father?
SAREK: There is no need to ask that question. You will not disappoint me. Not if your heart and spirit are truly Vulcan.

We already knew that Sarek was a stern, no-nonsense leader, but such uncompromising, relentless coldness is entirely untypical of him. He obviously has extremely high expectations of his son, and he does not accept any human notions in him. In a deleted scene of the Reboot, he tells Amanda that “his humanity is the very source of his ostracism”. Spock’s well-known personality, his attempts at complete flawlessness and perfection and his inherent difficulty with the processing of emotions is undoubtedly the product of this harsh upbringing. After Sarek’s death in Unification I, Captain Picard tells Commander Data:

“Father and son - both proud, both stubborn, more alike than either of them were prepared to admit. A lifetime spent building emotional barriers; they are very difficult to break down. And now the time has come and it's too late... it's a difficult moment. It's a lonely one. It's a moment that Spock is about to face.”

Their strained relationship reaches its peak when Spock decides to join Starfleet instead of fulfilling his father’s expectations of him going to study at the Vulcan Science Academy. Sarek himself is not particularly fond of Starfleet as he disapproves of their use of violence, even if it is only hypothetical – the fact that the Fleet’s ships carry weaponry is enough of a reason for the pacifist Vulcan. As every fan of Star Trek probably knows, since it is the type of information that tends to be displayed and included everywhere, Sarek and Spock did not talk “as father and son” for eighteen years after Spock’s decision. During most of Journey to Babel, they tend to pointedly ignore each other’s presence, and if they do interact, there is no trace of affection behind their words, only cold, professional logic.

The conflict that makes Journey to Babel such a fantastic episode is one of Spock’s loyalties. Spock is the only one who can save his father’s life by giving him a blood transfusion, but on the other hand, Spock needs to replace the wounded Captain on the bridge because the Enterprise is under attack from an alien vessel. While he does not want his father to die, he knows it would be logical to stay on the bridge during the time of danger. As he puts it, “Can you imagine what my father would say if I were to agree, if I were to give up command of this vessel, jeopardise hundreds of lives, risk interplanetary war, all for the life of one person?” Obviously, Spock is trying so hard to please his father by acting rationally and in true Vulcan fashion that he is prepared to accept his father’s very death in exchange.

In the end, of course, Sarek gets the transfusion, and there is a definite feeling of family reconciliation in the air. For a few years, father and son redevelop respect for each other, and in the end of The Voyage Home we see the following dialogue:

SPOCK: Father?
SAREK: I am returning to Vulcan within the hour. I would like to take my leave of you.
SPOCK: It was most kind of you to make this effort.
SAREK: It was not an effort. You are my son. Besides, I am most impressed with your performance in this crisis.
SPOCK: Most kind.
SAREK: As I recall, I opposed your enlistment in Starfleet. It is possible that my judgment was incorrect. Your associates are people of good character.
SPOCK: They are my friends.
SAREK: Yes, yes of course. Do you have a message for your mother?
SPOCK: Yes. Tell her… I feel fine. Live long and prosper, Father.
SAREK: Live long and prosper, my son.

The state of peace, however, did not last long. After leaving resigning from his post as science officer aboard the USS Enterprise, Spock finally follows his father’s footsteps and becomes an ambassador to the Federation as well. It is assumed that the two attended several diplomatic missions together. However, they soon split again over the Cardassian issue of the mid-2350s, when they began publically contradicting and objecting each other. As Perrin puts it: “They had argued for years. That was family. But when the debates over the Cardassian war began, he attacked Sarek's position publicly. He showed no loyalty to his father.” While Sarek pointed out errors in Spock’s logic and accused him of endangering the Federation by ignoring historic precedents, Spock argued that Sarek’s logic is too inflexible and conservative, clashing with the reality of changing times. In Unification II, Spock explains to Captain Picard: “I always had a different vision than my father. The ability to see beyond pure logic. He considered it weak.”

More importantly, Sarek strongly disapproved of Spock’s intention of reuniting the Vulcan people with the Romulans and his friendship with the Romulan senator Pardek, who also supported reunification. Sarek was correct in his presumption, since Pardek, “after spending decades building a reputation as an advocate for peace and supporting Vulcan-Romulan reunification, lured Spock to Romulus for false reunification talks; secretly, he had launched a Romulan invasion fleet to Vulcan.” (Memory-Alpha.org: Pardek)  - even though Sarek was already dead during these events.

These incidents, again, led to father and son almost refusing to acknowledge each other’s existence. Only much later, after Sarek realised that he would have no more than a year left to live, he expressed his wish for reconciliation. As Perrin told Captain Picard in Unification I: “He wants to see his son. He wants to heal any rift that may still remain. Now it may be too late.”

And it was too late, indeed. While his father was on his deathbed, Spock was involved in his campaign of reunification on Romulus, and for unknown reasons, he never came home, even though he was informed about Sarek’s illness. They had never chosen to mind-meld, so Sarek never had the chance to personally tell his son that despite all their conflicts, he always felt love and an exceptional pride for him and that secretly, he “admired him, the proud core of him that would not yield.”

Picard fulfils Sarek’s last wish and allows Spock to touch the memory of his father’s mind – which the Captain gathered during Sarek – by mind-melding with him. When Picard finds Spock on Romulus, the have the following conversation:

PICARD: He is a great man.
SPOCK: He was a great representative of the Vulcan people and of the Federation.
PICARD: I was with him before coming here. He expressed his pride in you. His love.
SPOCK: Emotional disarray was a symptom of the illness from which he suffered.
PICARD: No, those feelings came from his heart, Spock.

The episode Unification II ends with Spock initiating the mind meld. Before the screen goes dark, we see him silently crying for his loss and regret as he finally sees his father’s true feelings – it is one of the most mournful and touching scenes of the entire franchise.

In conclusion, it is probably clear now that Sarek is one of the most complicated and multi-facetted characters of the Star Trek universe. Not every bit of information regarding him has been analysed in this essay, but hopefully, the main points have given the reader an outline of his personality and an invitation to consider him and his implications independently. Not everyone views Sarek as one of the ‘good guys’. While he was an advocate of peace, acceptance and equality, many fans feel that his failure to administer these philosophies during the upbringing of his son make it impossible to see him as the proud and loving father he was – to the Federation in a metaphorical sense, and finally for Spock as well. Either way, taking sides in this discussion seems redundant at this point. Let it just be said that with Sarek, Gene Roddenberry gave us one of his deepest, darkest and most complex characters, and I am grateful for his creation.